More Pixar philosophy

The two most interesting points from the Harvard Business Review blog post "Pixar's Collective Genius" about keys to the successful leadership of Pixar cofounder Ed Catmull:



Redefining the vision. For decades, Ed's driving ambition was to help create the first full-length computer-animated feature film. After realizing that dream with Toy Story, he set himself a new goal: to build an organization that could continually produce magic long after he and Pixar's other cofounders were gone.


This is the challenge for all entrepreneurs: to make the transition from doing something themselves to creating organizations that can carry on without them. Walt Disney, genius that he was, failed this test.


Delegating power. Ed and his fellow executives give directors tremendous authority. At other studios, corporate executives micromanage by keeping tight control over production budgets and inserting themselves into creative decisions. Not at Pixar. Senior management sets budgetary and timeline boundaries for a production and then leave the director and his team alone.


Executives resist exercising creative authority even when it's thrust upon them. Take reviews of works in progress by "brain trusts" of directors at Pixar and Disney Animation. The rule is that all opinions are only advice that the director of the movie in question can use as he or she sees fit. Catmull, chief creative officer John Lasseter, and executive vice president of production Jim Morris often attend these sessions but insist that their views be treated the same way and refuse to let directors turn them into decision-makers.


Even when a director runs into deep trouble, Ed and the other executives refrain from personally taking control of the creative process. Instead, they might add someone to the team whom they think might help the director out of his bind. If nothing works, they'll change directors rather than fashion solutions themselves.



It's fascinating that Pixar is often spoken of as having such an empowering, delegation-based style while being fused at the hip with Apple, where you-know-who is famed for being a micro-managing tyrant (but one we love since we don't work for him).


Also, HBR hosts a longer interview with Ed Catmull, Pixar cofounder and president of Pixar and Disney Animation Studios titled How Pixar Fosters Collective Creativity.


I recently finished The Pixar Touch: The Making of a Company and am halfway through To Infinity and Beyond!: The Story of Pixar Animation Studios, both of which tell the history of Pixar. It's more of an improbable story than I'd realized. For many years before it became the success story we know today, Pixar struggled to stay in existence with meager to no revenues. The former book is recommended if you just want an inexpensive textual history of the company, while the latter is more expensive but larger, like a coffee table book, with color photos printed on high quality paper.



The world's most powerful copying machine

Transcript of a great lecture by Cory Doctorow on the Internet and copyright law. Besides covering DRM and copyright law, Doctorow touches on some of the same points Clay Shirky raises in Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, about the implications of the lowered costs of collaboration using the Internet.



Obama's economics worldview

A preview of a feature by David Leonhardt in this Sunday's NYTimes Magazine on Obama's economic policies. A really worthwhile read. You can choose who to vote for based on political ads or party affiliations, but this day and age makes it easier to research candidates than in years past, and it's worth the effort.


The press and the public have had a hard time coming up with an easy narrative for Obama's economics, perhaps because he doesn't fit neatly into pre-conceived economic stereotypes for liberal or conservative politicians.


He should have much appeal to voters who classify themselves as socially liberal, economically conservative.



The partial embrace of Reaganomics is a typical bit of Obama’s postpartisan veneer. In a single artful sentence, he dismissed the old liberals, aligned himself with the Bill Clinton centrists and did so by reaching back to a conservative icon who remains widely popular. But the words have significance at face value too. Compared with many other Democrats, Obama simply is more comfortable with the apparent successes of laissez-faire economics. Sunstein, now on the faculty at Harvard, has a name for this approach: “I like to think of him as a ‘University of Chicago’ Democrat.

8 short notes on the day of Phelps' 8th gold medal

You wouldn't think a man would have much leisure time in a race in which he sets a new world record of 9.69 seconds, but Usain Bolt had enough of a lead at the end of the men's 100-meter dash to blow out finger pistols, flash Jay-Z's Roc-A-Fella triangle hand sign, and check his watch.


If I were racing against him, I'd be intimidated just seeing "Bolt" on the back of his jersey.


***


I thought I saw Michael Phelps ride across the pool to his last medal ceremony standing on the backs of two dolphins, holding a trident.


***


I was wondering about something at dinner yesterday and saw that someone else had asked Marginal Revolution the same thing: for such a populous country, why has India won so few Olympic medals?


***


Visual evidence that Nikon has made a huge comeback against Canon in the professional sports photography market. Look at the lenses in this shot of the press photography area at the Olympics.


Black lenses are likely Nikon's mounted on D3's, while the light gray lenses are the Canons that used to dominate.


***


Is it worth carrying an airline-mile credit card? Probably not unless you are a big-spending, high-flying, elite status traveler. I ditched mine several years ago in favor of various cashback cards.


***


Is it really possible Anthony Lane didn't know right away which actor was playing Les Grossman in Tropic Thunder? From his review:



He is a doughy, balding monster with big spectacles and even wider hand gestures, all his power distilled into profanity: a grotesque update, if you will, on the movie executive with the shock of white-hot hair, brought to life by Rod Steiger, in “The Big Knife,

Oprah's political endorsement value

[via Marginal Revolution] A study on the value of Oprah's political endorsement to Barack Obama concludes that "her endorsement had a positive effect on the votes Obama received, increased the overall voter participation rate, and increased the number of contributions received by Obama." They also note that "the results ... suggest that Winfrey’s endorsement was responsible for approximately additional 1,000,000 votes for Obama"


The paper can be read as a PDF.


I cannot tell if 1MM incremental voters is valuable, though it feels like a strong number.


My curiosity is stoked: what are the five most valuable endorsements a candidate can receive? Labor unions? Governors? Senators? Newspapers? Which ones?



Brand Tags

I've meant for some time to link to Brand Tags, a site which asks users to help attach tag clouds to brand names. Users are served a series of brands and asked to enter the first word that comes to mind. The site then collects all the data and displays the results as a tag cloud. You could waste a good hour or two on the site seeing what people think of certain brands (and I have).


It's striking how similarly many people think of some brands, and even more striking to see how the advertising can affect some brands. When served Skyy Vodka, the first word that came to mind was "blue" as I could picture their ads in my head, with large bodies of water, the tall, blue glass bottle. I clicked through to see what other people had tagged the brand, and the largest tag above the fold was indeed "blue".


How successful are some branding campaigns? BMW has managed to attach "ultimate driving machine" to its brand. But the NBA, which has switched from "It's fantastic" to "where __ happens", hasn't really ingrained either in users' minds. The top tag for the NBA seems to be "Michael Jordan" which something about the league's struggles to establish its own identity since his Airness retired.


Here are some other brands and popular tags for them:


American Apparel: hipster, porn, cool, sex, nothing, boring, cheap, clothes


Amazon: awesome, books, buy, cheap, convenient, easy, everything, fast, great, shopping, useful, smile


New Yorker: cartoons, elite, elitist, intellectual, intelligent, magazine, old, pretentious, snob, snooty, sophisticated, stuffy


Microsoft: apple, awesome, bad, big, brother, bill, boring, buggy, computers, crap, crash, evil, empire, gates, huge, lame, monopoly, office, old, pc, shit, software, sucks, windows


Apple: amazing, apple, computers, arrogant, awesome, beautiful, best, bite, clean, computer, cool, creative, cult, design, elegant, elitist, expensive, gay, good, hip, innovation, ipod, love, overpriced, pretentious, simple, sleek, steve jobs, style, trendy, white


Segway: cool, dorky, dumb, expensive, fast, fun, gay, lame, lazy, nerd, scooter, silly, stupid, useless


Techcrunch: ?, arrington, blog, boring, cereal, computer, geek, huh?, nerd, news, no idea, nothing, tech, technology, no idea, what?, who?


Target: affordable, arrow, awesome, better than walmart, bullseye, clean, clothes, cool, design, dog, everything, fun, hip, shopping, store, value


Wal Mart: american, asda, bad, big, cheap, china, crap, everything, evil, exploitation, huge, low prices, redneck, shit, shop, shopping, store, supermarket, white trash


The site also stages brand battles, pitting brands against each other. Here's the leaderboard. Pixar, Adidas, Ferrari, Google, and M&Ms are the top 5. I was glad to see Maxtor at 651, near the bottom. I've had two of their hard drives fail on me in my G5 desktop, and I'll never touch another one of their drives again.



iPhone 3G pricing

Much has been made about the fact that the new iPhone 3G, while having a retail price much lower than the original iPhone ($199 versus $599 for the original iPhone or $399 price for the current equivalent model), has a monthly data plan rate much higher (I pay $20 a month now for unlimited data and 200 text messages, and the equivalent plan on the new 3G will cost $35 a month).


But the truth is, if Apple's goal is to drive up the volume of unit sales, this pricing scheme is great. People hear $199 and that's what they fixate on, not on the monthly bill which will chip away at their wallet over many months. Lowering the retail price of the handset while jacking up the monthly fees is smart pricing strategy.


I personally haven't decided whether to upgrade to the new model, but I have no doubt that millions of first-time buyers will find the new handset pricing just the reason to jump in. Apple set fire to the Motorola house and shattered some windows at the Blackberry mansion, and now, with this new pricing, they've returned with gasoline and a bazooka.



Innovators and innovation

Lots about innovation this past week. The May 12 edition of The New Yorker was the Innovators Issue, and one of the better ones in recent memory.


It features an article by Malcolm Gladwell, ostensibly about Nathan Myhrvold and his company Intellectual Ventures, a sort of idea-generating patent-filing machine, but really about the radical idea that innovation or innovative ideas may not be as rare as we think, may not be the result of genius and eureka moments. Can you capture innovation or ideas merely by dedicating time and resources to searching for them?


The issue also features a profile of someone who I've never heard of but whose work I've undoubtedly seen dozens if not hundreds of times: Pascal Dangin, the world's foremost digital retoucher of fashion photographs.




Vanity Fair, W, Harper’s Bazaar, Allure, French Vogue, Italian Vogue, V, and the Times Magazine, among others, also use Dangin. Many photographers, including Annie Leibovitz, Steven Meisel, Craig McDean, Mario Sorrenti, Inez van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin, and Philip-Lorca diCorcia, rarely work with anyone else. Around thirty celebrities keep him on retainer, in order to insure that any portrait of them that appears in any outlet passes through his shop, to be scrubbed of crow’s-feet and stray hairs.



I'm aware that most fashion photographs are worked over in post-production, but seeing an example of Dangin's work in the actual print copy of the issue surprised me with how much he actually alters body parts and features. Manipulating the truth, or giving the public what it wants?



But playing with the representational possibilities of photographs, and the bodies contained therein, has always aroused the suspicion of viewers with a perpetual, if naïve, desire for objective renderings of the world around them. As much as it is a truism that photography is subjective, it is also a truism that many of its beholders—even those who happily eliminate red-eye from their wedding albums—will take umbrage when confronted with evidence of its subjectivity. Eastlake was responding to the distress of certain members of the London Photographic Society over a series of photographs taken deliberately out of focus. More recently, Kate Winslet protested that the digital slimming of her figure on the cover of British GQ was “excessive,

Applying diminishing returns

Arnold Kling offers some life advice based on broader application of the law of diminishing returns.



My tip is to pay attention to the law of diminishing returns. For example, the number of authors who write two books that are worth reading is at least two orders of magnitude less than the number who write one book worth reading. Most of the time, you should assume that if you've read one book by a given author then you do not need to read another. Too many people follow the opposite strategy--reading more books by authors they like.


Staying in the same organization for more than few years also puts you on the wrong side of the point of diminishing returns. Working in an organization is a learning experience. But, as with going to college, there comes a time when you need to stop taking their courses and proceed to graduate.




Teachstreet launches

Big congratulations to my friend Dave and his team for launching Teachstreet yesterday morning. Teachstreet is a service that connects people who want to learn something with local teachers. In its beta incarnation, the site lists over 25,000 classes in Seattle.


I worked briefly for Dave at Amazon, and he was my roommate here in Santa Monica my first year in LA when he was helping his friends with JibJab. Everyone knows him as, first and foremost, one of the all around good guys. He has a very genuine enthusiasm and honesty that is rare in the corporate world. It's a combination of qualities more common in entrepreneurs, so it's only fitting that he's now launched his own company. I'll bet anything that his team and colleagues love working with him.


It's good to see a new generation of startup companies spawning out of the Amazon.com alumni network.



Extra extra

Interesting rumor: 24.4MP Nikon D3 replacement on the way? Or are some D3s 24.4MP cameras in waiting?


Unused script by Michael Chabon for Spiderman 2. (UPDATE: link to the full script PDF was removed, sadly)


New York state passes bill forcing Amazon.com to start charging New Yorkers sales tax. Ouch.


Steven Spielberg acquires the rights to make a 3-D live action version of Ghost in the Shell.



Ugly packaging, interesting goods


Fortune has an interview with Steve Jobs, who's always a good read.


Fortune is a reasonably well laid out magazine in print. Jobs is a design-obsessive. So there's some irony in the fact that this interview is stretched out across 15 pages so that Fortune.com can run more obnoxious ads that can cover up parts of the screen.


Technorati Tags: , , ,


Win-win

From here:



Your net carbon impact depends far more on the number of children you will have than any other variable; remember good environmentalism uses a zero rate of discount. So people with no biological children should be allowed to fly a lot and people with lots of biological children should not get to fly so much at all. Is that so far from the reality we observe?

Seems like the incentives are aligned all around on this. It's rough flying with kids, both on the parents and all the other fliers who empathize but really wish their noise-canceling headphones could filter out the high-frequency screaming of a distressed child.